Ginny Hendricks

Ginny Hendricks

Director of Member & Community Outreach

Biography

Since 2015, Ginny has been developing a community team at Crossref encompassing community engagement & comms, member experience, technical support, and metadata strategy. Before joining Crossref, she ran 'Ardent' for a decade, where she consulted within scholarly communications for awareness and growth strategies, branding and launching online products, and building digital communities. In 2018 she founded the [Metadata 20/20](https://www.metadata2020.org) collaboration to advocate for richer, connected, reusable, and open metadata, and she helps guide several open infrastructure initiatives such as [ROR](https://www.ror.org) and [POSI](https://openscholarlyinfrastructure.org/). She recently co-founded FORCE11's [Upstream](https://upstream.force11.org/) community blog for all things open research.

Topics

  • Metadata 20/20
  • Scholarly communications
  • international community engagement
  • branding and visual identity
  • ROR

Twitter

@GinnyLDN

ORCID iD

0000-0002-0353-2702

Ginny Hendricks's Latest Blog Posts

How funding agencies can meet OSTP (and Open Science) guidance using existing open infrastructure

In August 2022, the United States Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) issued a memo (PDF) on ensuring free, immediate, and equitable access to federally funded research (a.k.a. the “Nelson memo”). Crossref is particularly interested in and relevant for the areas of this guidance that cover metadata and persistent identifiers—and the infrastructure and services that make them useful. Funding bodies worldwide are increasingly involved in research infrastructure for dissemination and discovery.

ISR part two: How our membership approach helps to preserve the integrity of the scholarly record

In part one of our series on the Integrity of the Scholarly Record (ISR), we talked about how the metadata that our members register with us helps to preserve the integrity of the record, and in particular how ’trust signals’ in the metadata, combined with relationships and context, can help the community assess the work. In this second blog, we describe membership eligibility and what you can and cannot tell simply from the fact that an organisation is a Crossref member; why increasing participation and reducing barriers actually helps to enhance the integrity of the scholarly record; and how we handle the very small number of cases where there may be an question mark.

ISR part one: What is our role in preserving the integrity of the scholarly record?

Amanda Bartell, Thursday, Nov 17, 2022

In Research IntegrityTrustworthinessStrategy

Leave a comment

The integrity of the scholarly record is an essential aspect of research integrity. Every initiative and service that we have launched since our founding has been focused on documenting and clarifying the scholarly record in an open, machine-actionable and scalable form. All of this has been done to make it easier for the community to assess the trustworthiness of scholarly outputs. Now that the scholarly record itself has evolved beyond the published outputs at the end of the research process – to include both the elements of that process and its aftermath – preserving its integrity poses new challenges that we strive to meet… we are reaching out to the community to help inform these efforts.

Rethinking staff travel, meetings, and events

Ginny Hendricks, Friday, Sep 30, 2022

In CommunityCollaborationStaff

Leave a comment

As a distributed, global, and community-led organisation, sharing information and listening to our members both online and in person has always been integral to what we do. For many years Crossref has held both in-person and online meetings and events, which involved a fair amount of travel by our staff, board, and community. This changed drastically in March 2020, when we had to stop traveling and stop having in-person meetings and events.

Amendments to membership terms to open reference distribution and include UK jurisdiction

Ginny Hendricks, Friday, Sep 30, 2022

In ReferencesMetadataBoard

Leave a comment

Tl;dr Forthcoming amendments to Crossref’s membership terms will include: Removal of ‘reference distribution preference’ policy: all references in Crossref will be treated as open metadata from 3rd June 2022. An addition to sanctions jurisdictions: the United Kingdom will be added to sanctions jurisdictions that Crossref needs to comply with. Sponsors and members have been emailed today with the 60-day notice needed for changes in terms. Reference distribution preferences In 2017, when we consolidated our metadata services under Metadata Plus, we made it possible for members to set a preference for the distribution of references to Open, Limited, or Closed.

Read all of Ginny Hendricks's posts »